Return to Fort Rock Cave: Assessing the Site's Potential to Contribute

Thumbnail Image

Authors

Connolly, Thomas J.
Finley, Judson B.
Smith, Geoffrey M.
Jenkins, Dennis L.
Endzweig, Pamela E.
O'Neill, Brian L.
Baxter, Paul W.

Issue Date

2017

Type

Article

Language

en_US

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Oregon's Fort Rock Cave is iconic in respect to both the archaeology of the northern Great Basin and the history of debate about when the Great Basin was colonized. In 1938, Luther Cressman recovered dozens of sagebrush bark sandals from beneath Mt. Mazama ash that were later radiocarbon dated to between 10,500 and 9350 cal B.P. In 1970, Stephen Bedwell reported finding lithic tools associated with a date of more than 15,000 cal B.P., a date dismissed as unreasonably old by most researchers. Now, with evidence of a nearly 15,000-year-old occupation at the nearby Paisley Five Mile Point Caves, we returned to Fort Rock Cave to evaluate the validity of Bedwell's claim, assess the stratigraphic integrity of remaining deposits, and determine the potential for future work at the site. Here, we report the results of additional fieldwork at Fort Rock Cave undertaken in 2015 and 2016, which supports the early Holocene occupation, but does not confirm a pre-10,500 cal B.P. human presence.

Description

Citation

Connolly, T. J., Finley, J. B., Smith, G. M., Jenkins, D. L., Endzweig, P. E., O'Neill, B. L., & Baxter, P. W. (2017). RETURN TO FORT ROCK CAVE: ASSESSING THE SITE'S POTENTIAL TO CONTRIBUTE TO ONGOING DEBATES ABOUT HOW AND WHEN HUMANS COLONIZED THE GREAT BASIN. American Antiquity, 82(3), 558�"573. doi:10.1017/aaq.2017.12

Publisher

American Antiquity

License

In Copyright (All Rights Reserved)

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

ISSN

0002-7316

EISSN

Collections