Inept Reasoners or Pragmatic Virtuosos? Relevance and the Deontic Selection Task
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Girotto, V.
Kemmelmeier, Markus
Sperber, D.
van der Henst, JB
Issue Date
2001
Type
Citation
Language
Keywords
deontic inferences , information representation , reasoning , relevance theory , selection task
Alternative Title
Abstract
Most individuals fail the selection task, selecting P and Q cases, when they have to test descriptive rules of the form “If P, then Q”. But they solve it, selecting P and not-Q cases, when they have to test deontic rules of the form “If P, then must Q”. According to relevance theory, linguistic comprehension processes determine intuitions of relevance that, in turn, determine case selections in both descriptive and deontic problems. We tested the relevance theory predictions in a within-participants experiment. The results showed that the same rule, regardless of whether it is tested descriptively or deontically, can be made to yield more P and Q selections or more P and not-Q selections. We conclude that the selection task does not provide a tool to test general claims about human reasoning.
Description
Citation
Publisher
License
In Copyright
Journal
Volume
Issue
PubMed ID
ISSN
0010-0277