Gendered Influence of Downward Social Comparisons on Current and Possible Selves
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Kemmelmeier, Markus
Oyserman, Daphna
Issue Date
2001
Type
Citation
Language
Keywords
achievement settings , comparison (psychology) , culture , delinquency , esteem , explanations , gender , others , performance , psychology , self-confidence , self-evaluation , self image , sex-differences , sex differences (psychology) , similarity , social aspects , social issues , social research , stereotypes
Alternative Title
Abstract
Because men and women differ with regard to independent and interdependent self‐construals, we propose that downward comparisons are more likely to lower women's achievement‐related self‐evaluations compared to men's. We also hypothesize that gendered self‐schemas provide men with advantages in the processing of self‐related dispositional information and women with advantages in the processing of self‐related social‐contextual information. To the extent that a downward social comparison presents a potential threat to the self, men and women differ in how effectively they can fend off the implications of different types of comparisons. Results from three experiments (total N = 393) support these hypotheses, suggesting that gendered responses to downward comparison are at least in part driven by a culturally normative focus on dispositional information prevalent in the West.
Description
Citation
Publisher
License
In Copyright
Journal
Volume
Issue
PubMed ID
ISSN
0022-4537