Evaluation of Surface Fluxes in the WRF Model: Case Study for Farmland in Rolling Terrain

Thumbnail Image

Authors

Sun, Xia
Holmes, Heather A.
Osibanjo, Olabosipo O.
Sun, Yun
Ivey, Cesunica E.

Issue Date

2017

Type

Article

Language

Keywords

surface heat fluxes , numerical weather prediction , land surface models , planetary boundary layer schemes , atmospheric boundary layer

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

The partitioning of available energy into surface sensible and latent heat fluxes impacts the accuracy of simulated near surface temperature and humidity in numerical weather prediction models. This case study evaluates the performance of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model on the simulation of surface heat fluxes using field observations collected from a surface flux tower in Oregon, USA. Further, WRF-modeled heat flux sensitivities to North American Mesoscale (NAM) and North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) large-scale input forcing datasets
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land use datasets
Pleim-Xiu (PX) and Noah land surface models (LSM)
Yonsei University (YSU) and Mellor-Yamada-Janjic (MYJ) planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes using the Noah LSM
and Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 (ACM2) PBL scheme using PX LSM are investigated. The errors for simulating 2-m temperature, 2-m humidity, and 10-m wind speed were reduced on average when using NAM compared with NARR. Simulated friction velocity had a positive bias on average, with the YSU PBL scheme producing the largest overestimation in the innermost domain (0.5 km horizontal grid resolution). The simulated surface sensible heat flux had a similar temporal behavior as the observations but with a larger magnitude. The PX LSM produced lower and more reliable sensible heat fluxes compared with the Noah LSM. However, Noah latent heat fluxes were improved with a lower RMSE compared to PX, when NARR forcing data was used. Overall, these results suggest that there is not one WRF configuration that performs best for all the simulated variables (surface heat fluxes and meteorological variables) and situations (day and night).

Description

Citation

Sun, X., Holmes, H., Osibanjo, O., Sun, Y., & Ivey, C. (2017). Evaluation of Surface Fluxes in the WRF Model: Case Study for Farmland in Rolling Terrain. Atmosphere, 8(12), 197. doi:10.3390/atmos8100197

Publisher

License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

ISSN

2073-4433

EISSN

Collections